Betting 
Farense
0 – 1
Full time
Gil Vicente
Farense vs Gil Vicente betting tips
Farense vs Gil Vicente finished 0-1. Limited historical data available. Strong lean toward Under 3.5 based on recent scoring patterns.
What are the tips for Farense vs Gil Vicente?
Over/Under 3.5
Pick: Under 3.5
· Odds 1.18
· Prob 73%
VIP
Won
1X2
Pick: Final Time 1X
· Odds 1.39
· Prob 71%
VIP
Lost
Home Over/Under 1.5
Pick: Home Under 1.5
· Prob 63%
VIP
Won
Match insights: form, goals and model lean
Limited historical data available. Strong lean toward Under 3.5 based on recent scoring patterns.
Previous meetings and recent results
Farense recent
8 Dec 2024
Boavista vs Farense
1-1
29 Nov 2024
Farense vs Estrela da Amadora
1-0
9 Nov 2024
Casa Pia vs Farense
1-1
27 Oct 2024
SC Braga vs Farense
2-0
6 Oct 2024
Farense vs Estoril Praia
1-0
22 Sep 2024
Farense vs Arouca
0-1
1 Sep 2024
Nacional vs Farense
2-0
17 Aug 2024
Rio Ave vs Farense
1-0
11 Aug 2024
Farense vs Moreirense
1-2
18 May 2024
Farense vs Portimonense
1-3
Gil Vicente recent
7 Dec 2024
Gil Vicente vs Nacional
2-1
2 Dec 2024
Vitoria Guimaraes vs Gil Vicente
4-0
8 Nov 2024
Moreirense vs Gil Vicente
3-2
25 Oct 2024
Santa Clara vs Gil Vicente
2-1
28 Sep 2024
Benfica vs Gil Vicente
5-1
22 Sep 2024
Gil Vicente vs Casa Pia
1-1
14 Sep 2024
Famalicao vs Gil Vicente
1-1
1 Sep 2024
Gil Vicente vs SC Braga
0-0
25 Aug 2024
Estoril Praia vs Gil Vicente
0-0
10 Aug 2024
Porto vs Gil Vicente
3-0
Who will win Farense vs Gil Vicente?
Frequently asked questions
Who will win Farense vs Gil Vicente?
Our model currently leans Under 3.5 with about 73% confidence. See free and VIP markets below.
What are the odds for Farense vs Gil Vicente?
The featured free market shows odds around 1.18 (decimal). Switch odds format in the header if you prefer American or Fractional.
Where can I see H2H and recent form?
Scroll to Insights and H2H on this page for head-to-head results, recent W/D/L form, and goal averages when enough history is available.
Last updated 7 Nov 2026 08:36 UTC · Insights built from Betting Tips historical predictions · Data quality: insufficient