Birmingham
4 – 1
Full time
Shrewsbury
Birmingham vs Shrewsbury betting tips
Birmingham vs Shrewsbury finished 4-1. Limited historical data available. Strong lean toward Away Under 1.5 based on this side's recent goal averages.
What are the tips for Birmingham vs Shrewsbury?
Away Over/Under 1.5
Pick: Away Under 1.5
· Prob 79%
VIP
Won
Both Teams To Score
Pick: BTTS No
· Odds 1.49
· Prob 58%
VIP
Lost
1X2
Pick: Final Time 1
· Odds 1.19
· Prob 44%
VIP
Won
Match insights: form, goals and model lean
Limited historical data available. Strong lean toward Away Under 1.5 based on this side's recent goal averages.
Previous meetings and recent results
Head to head
Birmingham recent
15 Mar 2025
Northampton vs Birmingham
1-1
11 Mar 2025
Birmingham vs Stevenage
2-1
8 Mar 2025
Birmingham vs Lincoln
1-0
4 Mar 2025
Bolton vs Birmingham
3-1
1 Mar 2025
Birmingham vs Wycombe
1-0
25 Feb 2025
Birmingham vs Leyton Orient
2-0
15 Feb 2025
Birmingham vs Charlton
1-0
11 Feb 2025
Birmingham vs Cambridge United
4-0
18 Jan 2025
Birmingham vs Exeter
1-0
4 Jan 2025
Wigan vs Birmingham
0-3
Shrewsbury recent
15 Mar 2025
Shrewsbury vs Burton Albion
0-2
8 Mar 2025
Exeter vs Shrewsbury
2-0
4 Mar 2025
Shrewsbury vs Bristol Rovers
0-0
1 Mar 2025
Peterborough vs Shrewsbury
3-1
22 Feb 2025
Shrewsbury vs Stevenage
0-1
18 Feb 2025
Shrewsbury vs Huddersfield
0-1
15 Feb 2025
Shrewsbury vs Bolton
2-3
11 Feb 2025
Reading vs Shrewsbury
1-1
8 Feb 2025
Rotherham vs Shrewsbury
1-2
Who will win Birmingham vs Shrewsbury?
Frequently asked questions
Who will win Birmingham vs Shrewsbury?
Our model currently leans Away Under 1.5 with about 79% confidence. See free and VIP markets below.
What are the odds for Birmingham vs Shrewsbury?
Odds appear next to unlocked free tips. VIP odds unlock in the app or after full time.
Where can I see H2H and recent form?
Scroll to Insights and H2H on this page for head-to-head results, recent W/D/L form, and goal averages when enough history is available.
Last updated 8 Nov 2026 11:56 UTC · Insights built from Betting Tips historical predictions · Data quality: insufficient