Metta Riga
2 – 2
Full time
BFC Daugavpils
Metta Riga vs BFC Daugavpils betting tips
Metta Riga vs BFC Daugavpils finished 2-2. Limited historical data available. Strong lean toward Away Over 0.5 based on this side's recent goal averages.
What are the tips for Metta Riga vs BFC Daugavpils?
Away to Score
Pick: Away Over 0.5
· Prob 81%
VIP
Won
Home Over/Under 1.5
Pick: Home Under 1.5
· Prob 72%
VIP
Lost
1X2
Pick: Final Time 2
· Odds 2.00
· Prob 51%
VIP
Lost
Match insights: form, goals and model lean
Limited historical data available. Strong lean toward Away Over 0.5 based on this side's recent goal averages.
Previous meetings and recent results
Head to head
Metta Riga recent
29 May 2025
Auda Kekava vs Metta Riga
4-1
24 May 2025
Metta Riga vs Riga FC
0-3
20 May 2025
RFS Riga vs Metta Riga
2-0
11 May 2025
FK Tukums 2000 vs Metta Riga
2-0
2 May 2025
Metta Riga vs FK Liepaja
2-4
8 Apr 2025
Riga FC vs Metta Riga
1-1
7 Mar 2025
FK Liepaja vs Metta Riga
4-0
9 Nov 2024
Auda Kekava vs Metta Riga
5-0
BFC Daugavpils recent
13 Jun 2025
FK Liepaja vs BFC Daugavpils
1-1
25 May 2025
BFC Daugavpils vs FS Jelgava
1-0
20 May 2025
Auda Kekava vs BFC Daugavpils
1-1
14 May 2025
BFC Daugavpils vs Riga FC
0-1
9 May 2025
RFS Riga vs BFC Daugavpils
5-1
4 May 2025
Grobinas SC vs BFC Daugavpils
1-0
30 Apr 2025
FK Tukums 2000 vs BFC Daugavpils
0-0
19 Apr 2025
BFC Daugavpils vs FK Liepaja
4-2
10 Apr 2025
FS Jelgava vs BFC Daugavpils
4-1
Who will win Metta Riga vs BFC Daugavpils?
Frequently asked questions
Who will win Metta Riga vs BFC Daugavpils?
Our model currently leans Away Over 0.5 with about 81% confidence. See free and VIP markets below.
What are the odds for Metta Riga vs BFC Daugavpils?
Odds appear next to unlocked free tips. VIP odds unlock in the app or after full time.
Where can I see H2H and recent form?
Scroll to Insights and H2H on this page for head-to-head results, recent W/D/L form, and goal averages when enough history is available.
Last updated 6 Nov 2026 00:33 UTC · Insights built from Betting Tips historical predictions · Data quality: insufficient