FK Tukums 2000
3 – 2
Full time
Metta Riga
FK Tukums 2000 vs Metta Riga betting tips
FK Tukums 2000 vs Metta Riga finished 3-2. Limited historical data available. Strong model confidence for Final Time 12. Consider this a high-confidence pick.
What are the tips for FK Tukums 2000 vs Metta Riga?
1X2
Pick: Final Time 12
· Odds 1.25
· Prob 71%
VIP
Won
Both Teams To Score
Pick: BTTS Yes
· Odds 1.57
· Prob 52%
VIP
Won
Match insights: form, goals and model lean
Limited historical data available. Strong model confidence for Final Time 12. Consider this a high-confidence pick.
Previous meetings and recent results
Head to head
FK Tukums 2000 recent
14 Sep 2025
FK Liepaja vs FK Tukums 2000
4-1
30 Aug 2025
FK Tukums 2000 vs BFC Daugavpils
0-1
10 Aug 2025
FK Tukums 2000 vs Auda Kekava
1-0
3 Aug 2025
FK Tukums 2000 vs Riga FC
0-1
26 Jul 2025
RFS Riga vs FK Tukums 2000
6-2
6 Jul 2025
Super Nova Riga vs FK Tukums 2000
1-0
2 Jul 2025
Metta Riga vs FK Tukums 2000
0-3
25 Jun 2025
FK Tukums 2000 vs FK Liepaja
1-3
21 Jun 2025
BFC Daugavpils vs FK Tukums 2000
1-2
Metta Riga recent
29 Aug 2025
Metta Riga vs FK Liepaja
1-2
23 Aug 2025
BFC Daugavpils vs Metta Riga
4-2
3 Aug 2025
Auda Kekava vs Metta Riga
0-1
27 Jul 2025
Riga FC vs Metta Riga
3-2
19 Jul 2025
Metta Riga vs RFS Riga
0-4
6 Jul 2025
Grobinas SC vs Metta Riga
0-1
2 Jul 2025
Metta Riga vs FK Tukums 2000
0-3
21 Jun 2025
FK Liepaja vs Metta Riga
1-0
Who will win FK Tukums 2000 vs Metta Riga?
Frequently asked questions
Who will win FK Tukums 2000 vs Metta Riga?
Our model currently leans Final Time 12 with about 71% confidence. See free and VIP markets below.
What are the odds for FK Tukums 2000 vs Metta Riga?
The featured free market shows odds around 1.25 (decimal). Switch odds format in the header if you prefer American or Fractional.
Where can I see H2H and recent form?
Scroll to Insights and H2H on this page for head-to-head results, recent W/D/L form, and goal averages when enough history is available.
Last updated 29 Oct 2026 05:09 UTC · Insights built from Betting Tips historical predictions · Data quality: insufficient