Betting 
Gil Vicente
0 – 1
Full time
Tondela
Gil Vicente vs Tondela betting tips
Gil Vicente vs Tondela finished 0-1. Limited historical data available. Strong lean toward Away Under 1.5 based on this side's recent goal averages.
What are the tips for Gil Vicente vs Tondela?
Away Over/Under 1.5
Pick: Away Under 1.5
· Prob 74%
VIP
Won
Over/Under 2.5
Pick: Over 2.5
· Odds 2.10
· Prob 55%
VIP
Lost
1X2
Pick: Final Time 1
· Odds 1.62
· Prob 52%
VIP
Lost
Match insights: form, goals and model lean
Limited historical data available. Strong lean toward Away Under 1.5 based on this side's recent goal averages.
Previous meetings and recent results
Gil Vicente recent
9 Nov 2025
AVS Futebol SAD vs Gil Vicente
1-1
3 Nov 2025
Gil Vicente vs Santa Clara
1-0
26 Sep 2025
Benfica vs Gil Vicente
2-1
21 Sep 2025
Gil Vicente vs Estoril Praia
2-0
14 Sep 2025
SC Braga vs Gil Vicente
0-1
29 Aug 2025
Gil Vicente vs Moreirense
2-0
24 Aug 2025
Famalicao vs Gil Vicente
0-0
18 Aug 2025
Gil Vicente vs Porto
0-2
9 Aug 2025
Nacional vs Gil Vicente
0-2
16 May 2025
Rio Ave vs Gil Vicente
1-1
Tondela recent
8 Nov 2025
Tondela vs Vitoria Guimaraes
0-1
29 Oct 2025
Benfica vs Tondela
3-0
26 Oct 2025
Tondela vs Sporting CP
0-3
5 Oct 2025
Rio Ave vs Tondela
3-0
27 Sep 2025
Santa Clara vs Tondela
1-2
21 Sep 2025
Tondela vs Estrela da Amadora
0-0
31 Aug 2025
Tondela vs Estoril Praia
2-2
23 Aug 2025
Benfica vs Tondela
3-0
10 Aug 2025
SC Braga vs Tondela
3-0
11 May 2025
Tondela vs Alverca
1-2
Who will win Gil Vicente vs Tondela?
Frequently asked questions
Who will win Gil Vicente vs Tondela?
Our model currently leans Away Under 1.5 with about 74% confidence. See free and VIP markets below.
What are the odds for Gil Vicente vs Tondela?
Odds appear next to unlocked free tips. VIP odds unlock in the app or after full time.
Where can I see H2H and recent form?
Scroll to Insights and H2H on this page for head-to-head results, recent W/D/L form, and goal averages when enough history is available.
Last updated 27 Oct 2026 23:29 UTC · Insights built from Betting Tips historical predictions · Data quality: insufficient