Uruguay · Primera Division · Sun 22 Feb 2026 12:45 UTC · All tips 22 Feb

Montevideo Wanderers Montevideo Wanderers
0 – 4
Full time
Montevideo City Torque Montevideo City Torque

Montevideo Wanderers vs Montevideo City Torque betting tips

Montevideo Wanderers vs Montevideo City Torque finished 0-4. Strong lean toward Under 3.5 based on recent scoring patterns.

What are the tips for Montevideo Wanderers vs Montevideo City Torque?

Over/Under 3.5
Pick: Under 3.5 · Odds 1.20 · Prob 74%
VIP Lost
1X2
Pick: Final Time 12 · Odds 1.32 · Prob 69%
VIP Won
Home Over/Under 1.5
Pick: Home Under 1.5 · Prob 64%
VIP Won
Over/Under 2.5
Pick: Under 2.5 · Odds 1.59 · Prob 62%
VIP Lost
Both Teams To Score
Pick: BTTS No · Odds 1.79 · Prob 57%
VIP Won

Match insights: form, goals and model lean

Model lean

Under 3.5 74% Other 26%

Head to head (10)

3Montevideo Wanderers
4Draws
3Montevideo City Torque

Recent form

Montevideo Wanderers
W D D L D L L L L L
6 pts / 10
Montevideo City Torque
D L L W W L D W L W
14 pts / 10

Goals (avg last matches)

0.8 / 1.9 Montevideo Wanderers scored / conceded
1.6 / 1.3 Montevideo City Torque scored / conceded

Tip analysis

Strong lean toward Under 3.5 based on recent scoring patterns.

Previous meetings and recent results

Who will win Montevideo Wanderers vs Montevideo City Torque?

34 community votes

56% Montevideo Wanderers
15% Draw
29% Montevideo City Torque

Voting closed

Frequently asked questions

Who will win Montevideo Wanderers vs Montevideo City Torque?

Our model currently leans Under 3.5 with about 74% confidence. See free and VIP markets below.

What are the odds for Montevideo Wanderers vs Montevideo City Torque?

The featured free market shows odds around 1.20 (decimal). Switch odds format in the header if you prefer American or Fractional.

Where can I see H2H and recent form?

Scroll to Insights and H2H on this page for head-to-head results, recent W/D/L form, and goal averages when enough history is available.

Last updated 10 Nov 2026 19:19 UTC · Insights built from Betting Tips historical predictions · Data quality: ok