Latina
1 – 2
Full time
Casarano
Latina vs Casarano betting tips
Latina vs Casarano finished 1-2. Limited historical data available. Strong lean toward Under 3.5 based on recent scoring patterns.
What are the tips for Latina vs Casarano?
Over/Under 3.5
Pick: Under 3.5
· Odds 1.26
· Prob 76%
VIP
Won
1X2
Pick: Final Time 1X
· Odds 1.24
· Prob 74%
VIP
Lost
Home Over/Under 1.5
Pick: Home Under 1.5
· Prob 62%
VIP
Won
Over/Under 2.5
Pick: Under 2.5
· Odds 1.74
· Prob 62%
VIP
Lost
Match insights: form, goals and model lean
Limited historical data available. Strong lean toward Under 3.5 based on recent scoring patterns.
Previous meetings and recent results
Head to head
Latina recent
6 Apr 2026
Audace Cerignola vs Latina
1-1
28 Mar 2026
Latina vs Catania
0-1
22 Mar 2026
Cosenza vs Latina
3-1
14 Mar 2026
Latina vs Siracusa
2-1
8 Mar 2026
Salernitana vs Latina
2-1
5 Mar 2026
Latina vs Sorrento
2-0
1 Mar 2026
Giugliano vs Latina
1-1
21 Feb 2026
Latina vs Potenza
0-1
14 Feb 2026
Benevento vs Latina
1-1
10 Feb 2026
Team Altamura vs Latina
1-0
Casarano recent
29 Mar 2026
Casarano vs Giugliano
2-0
23 Mar 2026
Catania vs Casarano
1-1
14 Mar 2026
Casarano vs Cosenza
2-1
9 Mar 2026
Monopoli 1966 vs Casarano
2-1
5 Mar 2026
Casarano vs Siracusa
1-1
28 Feb 2026
Foggia vs Casarano
1-2
14 Feb 2026
Casarano vs Casertana
3-2
7 Feb 2026
Casarano vs Sorrento
2-0
31 Jan 2026
Cavese 1919 vs Casarano
1-1
24 Jan 2026
Casarano vs Picerno
2-2
Who will win Latina vs Casarano?
Frequently asked questions
Who will win Latina vs Casarano?
Our model currently leans Under 3.5 with about 76% confidence. See free and VIP markets below.
What are the odds for Latina vs Casarano?
The featured free market shows odds around 1.26 (decimal). Switch odds format in the header if you prefer American or Fractional.
Where can I see H2H and recent form?
Scroll to Insights and H2H on this page for head-to-head results, recent W/D/L form, and goal averages when enough history is available.
Last updated 29 Oct 2026 02:26 UTC · Insights built from Betting Tips historical predictions · Data quality: insufficient