RFS Riga
5 – 1
Full time
Metta Riga
RFS Riga vs Metta Riga betting tips
RFS Riga vs Metta Riga finished 5-1. Limited historical data available. Strong lean toward Home Over 0.5 based on this side's recent goal averages.
What are the tips for RFS Riga vs Metta Riga?
Home to Score
Pick: Home Over 0.5
· Prob 87%
VIP
Won
Away Over/Under 1.5
Pick: Away Under 1.5
· Prob 75%
VIP
Won
Home Over/Under 1.5
Pick: Home Over 1.5
· Prob 66%
VIP
Won
1X2
Pick: Final Time 1
· Odds 1.07
· Prob 58%
VIP
Won
Over/Under 2.5
Pick: Over 2.5
· Odds 1.20
· Prob 58%
VIP
Won
Match insights: form, goals and model lean
Limited historical data available. Strong lean toward Home Over 0.5 based on this side's recent goal averages.
Previous meetings and recent results
RFS Riga recent
28 Sep 2025
FK Liepaja vs RFS Riga
2-2
21 Sep 2025
RFS Riga vs BFC Daugavpils
5-1
13 Sep 2025
RFS Riga vs FS Jelgava
1-4
31 Aug 2025
Auda Kekava vs RFS Riga
0-1
10 Aug 2025
RFS Riga vs Super Nova Riga
4-1
3 Aug 2025
Grobinas SC vs RFS Riga
2-3
26 Jul 2025
RFS Riga vs FK Tukums 2000
6-2
19 Jul 2025
Metta Riga vs RFS Riga
0-4
Metta Riga recent
20 Sep 2025
FK Tukums 2000 vs Metta Riga
3-2
29 Aug 2025
Metta Riga vs FK Liepaja
1-2
23 Aug 2025
BFC Daugavpils vs Metta Riga
4-2
3 Aug 2025
Auda Kekava vs Metta Riga
0-1
27 Jul 2025
Riga FC vs Metta Riga
3-2
19 Jul 2025
Metta Riga vs RFS Riga
0-4
6 Jul 2025
Grobinas SC vs Metta Riga
0-1
2 Jul 2025
Metta Riga vs FK Tukums 2000
0-3
21 Jun 2025
FK Liepaja vs Metta Riga
1-0
Who will win RFS Riga vs Metta Riga?
Frequently asked questions
Who will win RFS Riga vs Metta Riga?
Our model currently leans Home Over 0.5 with about 87% confidence. See free and VIP markets below.
What are the odds for RFS Riga vs Metta Riga?
Odds appear next to unlocked free tips. VIP odds unlock in the app or after full time.
Where can I see H2H and recent form?
Scroll to Insights and H2H on this page for head-to-head results, recent W/D/L form, and goal averages when enough history is available.
Last updated 28 Oct 2026 23:15 UTC · Insights built from Betting Tips historical predictions · Data quality: insufficient