Betting 
FS Jelgava
2 – 2
Full time
Metta Riga
FS Jelgava vs Metta Riga betting tips
FS Jelgava vs Metta Riga finished 2-2. Limited historical data available. Strong lean toward Under 3.5 based on recent scoring patterns.
What are the tips for FS Jelgava vs Metta Riga?
Over/Under 3.5
Pick: Under 3.5
· Odds 1.43
· Prob 74%
VIP
Lost
1X2
Pick: Final Time 1X
· Odds 1.35
· Prob 72%
VIP
Won
Over/Under 2.5
Pick: Under 2.5
· Odds 2.13
· Prob 62%
VIP
Lost
Match insights: form, goals and model lean
Limited historical data available. Strong lean toward Under 3.5 based on recent scoring patterns.
Previous meetings and recent results
Head to head
FS Jelgava recent
25 Oct 2025
FK Liepaja vs FS Jelgava
2-2
18 Oct 2025
FS Jelgava vs BFC Daugavpils
0-0
27 Sep 2025
FS Jelgava vs Auda Kekava
1-1
21 Sep 2025
FS Jelgava vs Riga FC
2-3
13 Sep 2025
RFS Riga vs FS Jelgava
1-4
29 Aug 2025
Grobinas SC vs FS Jelgava
3-2
2 Aug 2025
FS Jelgava vs FK Liepaja
1-2
27 Jul 2025
BFC Daugavpils vs FS Jelgava
2-0
5 Jul 2025
Auda Kekava vs FS Jelgava
2-0
1 Jul 2025
Riga FC vs FS Jelgava
3-0
Metta Riga recent
26 Oct 2025
Metta Riga vs Auda Kekava
3-2
19 Oct 2025
Metta Riga vs Riga FC
0-1
5 Oct 2025
RFS Riga vs Metta Riga
5-1
20 Sep 2025
FK Tukums 2000 vs Metta Riga
3-2
29 Aug 2025
Metta Riga vs FK Liepaja
1-2
23 Aug 2025
BFC Daugavpils vs Metta Riga
4-2
3 Aug 2025
Auda Kekava vs Metta Riga
0-1
27 Jul 2025
Riga FC vs Metta Riga
3-2
19 Jul 2025
Metta Riga vs RFS Riga
0-4
Who will win FS Jelgava vs Metta Riga?
Frequently asked questions
Who will win FS Jelgava vs Metta Riga?
Our model currently leans Under 3.5 with about 74% confidence. See free and VIP markets below.
What are the odds for FS Jelgava vs Metta Riga?
The featured free market shows odds around 1.43 (decimal). Switch odds format in the header if you prefer American or Fractional.
Where can I see H2H and recent form?
Scroll to Insights and H2H on this page for head-to-head results, recent W/D/L form, and goal averages when enough history is available.
Last updated 28 Oct 2026 14:12 UTC · Insights built from Betting Tips historical predictions · Data quality: insufficient